I would disagree. I would say that the concept of justice is not clear or in other words what qualify as judicious decision is not clear. But We are unsure whether justice is relativistic or absolute.
Plato’s concept of forms is based on his two-world metaphysical reality . Now in the euthyphro dilemma, we are trying to fix the level of absolutism w.r.t god. Even the dilemma itself is already answered by my previous comment about level of judiciousness. Look at slavery, in Old testament it is not outright rejected as in modern times, but pedophilia is rejected with out second thought by almost all civilization. The relativistic ethical perspective is easily obtained in these situations but when I say conceptual understanding of certain things is essential to final quality relativism as the zenith of ethical justice.
Mirror 
Can’t agree about justice
LikeLike
Why? Please provide reasons for your disagreement?
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know justice is not a clear concept. It’s relative
LikeLike
Justice is a relative concept
LikeLike
I would disagree. I would say that the concept of justice is not clear or in other words what qualify as judicious decision is not clear. But We are unsure whether justice is relativistic or absolute.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How can it be when the euthyphro delimma remains unanswered
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plato’s concept of forms is based on his two-world metaphysical reality . Now in the euthyphro dilemma, we are trying to fix the level of absolutism w.r.t god. Even the dilemma itself is already answered by my previous comment about level of judiciousness. Look at slavery, in Old testament it is not outright rejected as in modern times, but pedophilia is rejected with out second thought by almost all civilization. The relativistic ethical perspective is easily obtained in these situations but when I say conceptual understanding of certain things is essential to final quality relativism as the zenith of ethical justice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So you are saying you answered the delimma
LikeLike
No. I am saying that the dilemma itself is a illogical as there is no need of God to prove ethical decision and justice system.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Then you are saying there is no god
LikeLike
Yes. Such an entity is not needed to analyse these fundamental ideas. Even if he exist or not , it doesn’t matter.
LikeLike